Titling and Women
As I worked on titling of public lands
with local governments and DENR, I didn’t give much thought to how gender
mattered in our work. Until a title distribution ceremony in Alburquerque,
Bohol, when USAID Mission Director Gloria Steele noticed that most of the title
claimants were women. That got me and my friends thinking about whether the
percentage of women title holders has increased, what are the reasons for the
increase, and whether owning titles has empowered women.
Eng’r Rhea Dealca sent me a copy of
Kate Dalrymple and Brenda Batistiana’s paper, “Bringing Land and Gender Equity
to the Surface”[1]. In it the authors presented data from the
Department of Agrarian Reform and the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR) from 2003 to 2007, which said that in 2006 women received only 25%
of the total number of Certificates of Land Ownership, and only 18% of leasehold
contracts (for land areas exempted from agrarian reform). From 2003 to 2007, women received only 39% of
the public land patents issued by DENR were women.
This was even after DENR’s Department
Administration Order No. 13 was issued in 2002. DAO 13-2002 removed gender bias in the
acceptance and processing of homestead patent and other public land applications.
Dalrymple and Batistiana explained that DAO 13-2002 repealed paragraph 8 of the
Lands Administrative Order 7-1 (as amended), which disqualified unmarried women
from applying for homestead patents. LAO7-1 also allowed married women to apply
for these patents only if (a) she is living separately from her husband and is
not dependent on him; (b) her husband is insane or physically incapacitated to work;
and (c) her husband is in prison serving a term of such duration as would
prevent him from complying with the requirement of residency or occupancy in
the applied land. DAO 13-2002 changed all that; it made women, married or not,
eligible to apply for patents.
Dalrymple and Batistiana also noted
that Section 45 of the Property Registration Decree of 1978 requires that the
names of both spouses should be included in the titling of conjugal properties. In the case of Jocson vs Court of Appeals[2], the Supreme Court had
ruled that the words “married to” in a land title merely describes the civil
status of the owner and does not prove that the property is conjugally owned.
Section 45 intends to clarify the conjugal ownership of properties and protects
the interests of the wife.
Today the figures suggest improvements
in gender awareness and empowerment in titling. While I don’t have access to
national statistics, I was able to gather some Provincial level data on the
number of titles issued, and how many of these titles were for women.
Eng’r Dealca
ascertained from DENR records that in the Province of Bohol a total of 15,075
titles were issued in 2011. Of those
titles 40% were issued to females (6,039) titles and 60% (9,036 titles) were
issued to males.
Loubert Tan, searching patent issuance
records from the Office of PENRO-Cebu Richard Abella, reported that 967
Residential Free Patents have been issued since RA 10023 became law in 2010. Of
the, 538 were issued to men (44%), while 538 were issued to women (56%).
I also had the good fortune of
visiting Maramag, Bukidnon, which had been active in systematic adjudication
since LAMP 2 (and now continues with LGU-led Titling under the provisions of
DENR DAO 06-2011 and DILG MC 117-2011).
Assessor Evelyn Lantong told me that of the 1,284 land titles they
helped to release, 675 were for males, 556 were for females, 8 were for
spouses, and 4 were for joint heirs.
Vera Gesite, Consultant to the Mayor
of Alburquerque in Bohol, conducted interviews with women title holders. She
asked why it was the women who got the titles, and how it has benefited them.
Many of these women got the title by
inheritance – apparently there is a tradition of leaving the land (and the
ancestral home) to the youngest daughter.
The titles were used by some
beneficiaries (not all) as collateral for business loans. The businesses
included running a multicab (public utility vehicle), Tupperware
distributorship, for retail of bulad
(dried fish). One title holder took a loan to finance the training of her son,
who is now employed as a seaman. Another used loan proceeds to pay for
treatment for a daughter with heart ailment.
These loans ranged from 10,000.00 to
100,000.00. These were taken out from
neighbors, not financing institutions nor banks.
One beneficiary plans to build a
lodging house on her property, which she can bequeath to her only son. Many
beneficiaries are also planting trees (star apple, mahogany, gemelina, coconut,
banana, ipil-ipil, mango, banana, ube, etc) on their property as investment. They
sell the products of fruit-bearing trees.
At least one title holder is just
waiting for prices to go up so she can sell one of her two lands, but most just
want to pass the land on to their own children.
One lot owner said it was enough for
her to feel secured about her ownership of her land.
Now in all my meetings with LGUs and
DENR partners I make it a habit to bring up the gender aspect of titling.
Talking about it tends to generate more awareness about how titling can empower
women. And hopefully encourage our partners to take positive action to help
more women get titles to their lands.
[1]
A
paper presented by the authors during the 7th FIG
Regional Conference, titled “Spatial Data Serving People: Land Governance and
the Environment – Building the Capacity”, in Hanoi, Vietnam, on 19-22 October
2009.
[2]
Agustina
Jocson-Vasquez and Ernesto Vasquez; G.R. No. 55322, February 16,
1989)
Comments
Post a Comment